When he was 12 years old, John Gamble's face peered out from behind a football helmet on the front page of the Carlsbad Current-Argus -- he was the quarterback for the Spartans, a local youth team.
A few years later, Gamble was on the front page for a different reason -- at 16, he had killed a friend. A jury found him guilty of first-degree murder, and a judge sent him to prison for 60 years.
The youngest of six children, John Gamble was born in his parents' bedroom. The family lived across the street from a city park in Carlsbad, where his older sister Mary would take him to play on the swings and the merry-go-round. As he grew older, he became an avid sportsman: football, baseball, tennis, gymnastics.
"It wasn't unusual to see him on the front page of the newspaper for one sport or another," Mary said.
When he was 12 years old, John's face peered out from behind a football helmet on the front page of the Carlsbad Current-Argus -- he was the quarterback for the Spartans, a local youth team.
A few years later, John was on the front page for a different reason -- at 16, he had killed a friend. A jury found him guilty of first-degree murder, and a judge sent him to prison for 60 years.
"What I did was horrible," Gamble, 27, said in an interview at the Lea County Correctional Facility in Hobbs.
If New Mexico law stays the same, he will spend at least the next four decades of his life in prison. Gamble is one of about three dozen New Mexicans currently incarcerated for 30 years or more for crimes they committed when they were under 18, according to a review by Searchlight New Mexico.
State Sen. Bill O'Neill, D-Albuquerque, is working on new legislation to give people like Gamble another chance at life outside prison. O'Neill is still crafting the bill, but his goal is to provide an earlier opportunity for a parole hearing for those inmates.
He will speak on a panel addressing the ideas behind the bill at a legislative committee hearing Oct. 9.
"There's always the chance for rehabilitation," O'Neill said.
This wouldn't be a "free ticket out of jail," he said. The parole board could deny release if it decides an inmate isn't ready to reenter society. O'Neill said he is particularly sensitive to the families of the victims of violent crimes and is committed to working with them through the process.
The potential legislative change rests on a growing body of science showing that young brains are not fully developed -- and, by implication, children should be held to a different standard than adults. That science already has convinced the U.S. Supreme Court that children deserve more leniency and has influenced sentencing laws across the country.
"Children are better than the worst thing that they've done," said Denali Wilson, a third-year student at the University of New Mexico School of Law, who is collaborating with lawyers, academics and advocates on behalf of children who've been given long adult sentences. She's also been working with Gamble's family and the relatives of other inmates.
"No one deserves to be irrevocably judged on their place in society based on their adolescence," she said.
Thousands of men and women across the country are serving life sentences, or sentences of 50 years or more, for something they did as children, according to The Sentencing Project, a Washington, D.C.-based organization that advocates for criminal justice reform. At the end of 2016, the number stood at about 12,000.
Scientists agree that young people are more able to change than adults, but each case is unique. In New Mexico, many of the children serving long adult sentences were convicted of murder. Yet little research has been done on children who kill.
States expanding juvenile courts
The U.S. is unique among nations for its focus on incarceration, locking away just over 2 million adults in prisons and jails, more than any other country, according to the World Prison Brief, a database run by the University of London. According to the data, the U.S. incarceration rate is about twice that of Russia and five times China's. The practice of sending children to adult prisons for the rest of their lives is unique to this country, according to The Sentencing Project.
For many young people who commit heinous crimes in New Mexico, there are therapeutic alternatives to adult prison. Depending on the crime, the child can be tried in juvenile court, with different rules and more leniency than the adult system.
But some children don't get to benefit from the juvenile system. Because Gamble was charged with first-degree murder, he was tried as an adult. That's the law in New Mexico.
"When you see the conviction for first-degree for a juvenile," said District Attorney Dianna Luce of New Mexico's 5th Judicial District, it means the young person has "truly done something that is thought out, that is just horrific and sends fear throughout our community."
The details of Gamble's crime are brutal.
One night in 2008, when he was 16, he got into a fight with a friend. The two previously had broken into a school together, and Gamble suspected his friend had ratted him out to the police. Gamble punched him repeatedly, kneed him in the head and hit him with a rifle, according to court records. When the 15-year-old friend stopped moving, Gamble doused the body with gasoline and set it on fire.
At the beginning of his 60-year sentence, he spent nearly a year and a half in solitary confinement, locked in his cell 23 hours a day -- and when he went outside, he said, he was confined to a private cage. A New Mexico Department of Corrections spokesperson said Gamble was separated from the general prison population for his own safety.
Whether such long sentences make sense for children, even those who commit violent acts, has been challenged by recent scientific developments. Advanced imaging techniques allow researchers to "look, almost voyeuristically, under the hood of the teenage brain," said BJ Casey, a psychology professor at Yale University. What researchers are finding confirms common wisdom: In many cases, younger people are more impulsive and tend to think less about future consequences than adults. They're often easily influenced by peers and highly susceptible to emotions.
As the brain grows, people are better able to make rational decisions. In a recent article, Casey wrote that the brain keeps developing past age 20, which further calls into question the practice of doling out adult punishments to teenagers.
In light of the changes in scientific thinking, some states have made an effort to broaden the purview of juvenile courts beyond what's typically considered childhood. Vermont recently expanded the jurisdiction of children's courts to cover anyone under age 19 unless they are charged with one or more of a dozen violent crimes, like murder, kidnapping and sexual assault; the change goes into effect next year and the age increases to 20 in 2022. Similar bills have been introduced in Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois and Massachusetts.
'They've revolutionized sentencing'
At a national level, the Supreme Court has used the latest science to justify limiting situations where youths receive adult sentences.
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled that children convicted of crimes other than homicide could not be sent to prison for the rest of their lives. In 2012, it set strict limits on when judges can hand out life sentences without parole to children who commit murder. And in 2016, it ruled that the 2012 decision applied retroactively.
"They've revolutionized sentencing," said Marsha Levick, co-founder and chief legal officer at the Juvenile Law Center, a Philadelphia nonprofit law firm that advocates for children.
"The court said, 'We know you committed murder, but you who committed this murder under the age of 18 are entitled to a second chance,' " Levick said. "You are entitled to demonstrate growth and maturity and rehabilitation. You're entitled to a chance at redemption."
These legal developments have had little impact in New Mexico. That's because, in many ways, the state was already ahead of the curve.
In 1975, New Mexico banned the death penalty for juveniles. It wasn't until 2005 that the U.S. Supreme Court outlawed the practice around the country.
And in 1993, New Mexico set a high bar for sending juveniles to adult prison. Even children who commit certain violent crimes -- second-degree murder, kidnapping and robbery -- can only be sent to adult prison if the state demonstrates they cannot be treated. Only young people who commit first-degree murder can receive a life sentence. In New Mexico, a life sentence means 30 years in prison, followed by parole hearings every two years.
Because Gamble got a 60-year sentence rather than a life sentence, he is not eligible for parole after 30 years.
While New Mexico's laws are relatively lenient, there are at least 87 men and women currently incarcerated in adult prisons with sentences of 10 years or more for crimes they committed as children, according to a Searchlight analysis of court documents, state data and information provided by Wilson, the UNM law student. That includes 39 people serving a sentence of 30 years or more, many of whom could remain in prison for the rest of their lives.
'No making up for it'
Gamble had a troubled childhood. He recalled harsh discipline. He smoked his first cigarette when he was 7 or 8, encouraged by older friends. Eventually, he turned to alcohol, pills and cocaine.
Addiction took hold of him, and he started stealing for money to buy drugs, he said. He robbed his own family and his friends. He was in and out of his parents' home. At night, he wandered through parking lots, looking for unlocked cars to burglarize. He attended a few court-ordered classes, where he watched videos of babies born addicted to drugs, but he didn't change his behavior, he said.
In prison, Gamble is trying to set himself on a better path.
He graduated from a seminary training program in 2017. He mentors fellow inmates. He plays guitar in a Christian worship band.
But he doesn't know how to meaningfully apologize for killing his friend, he said. "For the things I've done, there's no making up for it," Gamble said.
And although he wants to get out of prison, he said, in the end, there's nothing he can do to be worthy of such a future.
"No matter what I do with my life, no matter how much good I do, it's never going to bring me to a point where I deserve a second chance."
In order to read our site, please exit private/incognito mode or log in to continue.